abufarsi wrote:Ah yes...
No surprise there. Making peace is usually preferred to making war.
It's been said 'If you want peace, prepare for war', but I'm not sure that we were under threat from the aspiring and optimistic teacher who started the thread.
abufarsi wrote:None of those who voted felt that taking the high road was worth risking social isolation, and that is why people from all perspectives write, or read, so we can have insight into the hearts of others.
I'm not sure what you mean by the above. I don't mind risking social isolation, but I'm not sure if we're of the same mind as to what constitutes the high road here. Either way, I didn't cast a vote. I'm all for free speech but I think there might be a better place to air your views, such as in another thread. I note Edwin's comment, however:
Is this contemporaneous evidence of election fraud???

You just can't trust those corrupt vote-fixing teachers can you?!?

(kidding)
abufarsi wrote:No place is perfect. Not the USA, Not the Philippines. In the USA criticism is every where in the press. Surely it is 95% of Fox news. Not a bit of it is hateful or hurtful. It is an idea that if problems are exposed to public inspection, they are far more likely to be resolved.
I agree that exposing problems can be a positive step towards attending to them. I'm all for discussion of issues, including robust discussion where warranted.
abufarsi wrote:I am an American, but criticism of America does not offend me.
If you are a Filipino, why should criticism of the Philippines offend you?
It may not be the broad concept criticism per se that people are objecting to, but the forum (meaning, in this case, the specific thread) that you've chosen. Maybe some cultures deal with criticism differently, I'm not American of Filipino, and I'm not offended by criticism in and of itself but then again you did apologise to Rhusette earlier in the thread.
You've raised some interesting topics, but I reckon they're worthy of a thread of their own if they're to be dicsussed. I'd also offer that the more constructive the criticism the more likely it is to be well received, and that's more than a mere matter of semantics.