crisipicada wrote:The soul that sinneth, it shall die. Ezekiel 18:20.
(...)
the penalty for sin must be paid in full. That penalty is death (eternal separation from God, the giver and sustainer of life), and it was pronounced upon the entire human race: “The soul that sinneth, it shall die....For the wages of sin is death...” (Eze:18:20; Rom:6:23). This penalty cannot be waived even by God himself
Just to add some insights.
Ha-Nefesh Ha-Chotet Hi Tamot Ezekiel 18:20
Nefesh is translated as "soul", but this is a very approximate translation. In Hebrew, Neshamah is the word for the upper soul, the holy spark given to us by the Lord. Nefesh refers to the "bodily soul", i.e. the passional soul. This is the vegetative soul that is in us. To understand better, I will make an example: A person's body is hungry because there is no food. The hunger stirs the reactive response, or impulse of surviving, of the person (this is the Nefesh) and the person robs (commits sin). The Nefesh is the seat of the lower reactive passions and it is very connected to the moral/ethic behavior. When we fail in controlling our basic instincts/emotions (Nefesh), we are punishable.
The Nefesh resides in the domain of good and evil, and thus it is subject to death anyway (be it because of punishment or natural death). The Neshamah, instead, is God's spark, and thus it shares His qualities (immortality, being immutable, etc.).
Now, the word used for "shall die" is simply Tamot. This is simple death/absence. It is not really a punishment, because other words are used in the Bible for the real punishments by death: for example Karet (excision from God, or head cutting). Tamot means simply: will cease to exist. The sin will not be paid for (wrong interpretation), it will simply cease to exist (i.e. the sinful instinct will have no reason to exist any longer). This is what the Bible is telling us.
Now, the sentence "This penalty cannot be waived even by God himself" is a misinterpretation again. If Tamot is simple ceasing and God is the good and the light... there is nothing preventing Him from allowing evil and sin to exist again. This traces back to the question: Why does God allow sin to exist? We know He allows it, and even sin is at His service. Without sin and darkness, there would be no progression. An angel cannot improve, has no margin to do something better or something worse. But man can, he has the free will, because he lives in a dimension where both good and evil coexist and allow an entire gradient of shades.
Ki Lechatoa Yesh Shakar Mavet (Romans 6:23)
Mavet means "death"; again, simple absence/death.
One of the biggest problems with Christian sermonists is that usually they have no knowledge of Hebrew. So they easily misinterpret the Word of God. This gives rise to easy sectarism, where everybody thinks he has the sole truth. We should remember that the original sin of Eve was that she "added" some words that were not said, changing with her interpretation the real meaning of the thing and inducing Adam into the same mistake. So, it is a heavy sin to misinterpret the Scriptures.
However, I think that all interpretations show some shades and nuances that can teach something. Provided that we don't lean blindly to one side or the other, but take them as a whole. Well, that's what my ministry is about, so to speak.
At the end, a free interpretation is just what a soul mirrors or perceives from a holy message. So, it can always provide additional insights.
How to know if an interpretation is truthful? As a rule of thumb to know if somebody is speaking the right thing, I try to match his interpretation with various other denominations of churches. When all agree, probably it is correct. When they disagree, I take a closer examination and go to the sources. The most common thing I find is that they really don't know what they are talking about and just misinterpret the original messages, usually because of lack of proper knowledge (for example, they don't know Hebrew). Another sign of wrong interpretation is bigotry, sectarianism, and thinking they have the sole truth. This is a clear indication they are sinning, as the Lord professed values of tolerance and love, not discrimination and social hate. So, their interpretation must be definitely wrong and far removed from God's word.
Another sign of misinterpretation is when they say contradicting things. For example, "The Gospel is separated from all religions by the uncompromising declaration of every biblical prophet that for God to forgive sins and reconcile man to Himself, the penalty for sin must be paid in full" contradicts with the same quote of Ezekiel 18:20: "The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son". So, what penalty should be paid in full *if* "the son shall not bear the guilt"? Now, to whom will you give credit, to the Bible verse, or to the sermonist who says that "the penalty for sin must be paid in full"? Well, without entering the subject in depth, you even notice: "The Gospel is separated from all religions by the uncompromising declaration of every biblical prophet". But the Gospel was given *after* the biblical prophets. Does the sermonist know what he is talking about? Does not seem like. We must always take heed to check what are the sources from where our spiritual instruction comes from. If we are not alert and prudent, we can easily be lead to believe false or severely flawed things.
"The real opposite of love is not hate, but indifference" (Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz)